Skip to main content
Understanding Risk
  • Events
  • Initiatives
  • Resources
  • Topics
  • News
  • Opportunities
  • About
  • Search
UR on Twitter UR LinkedIn

Open Source

Related Regions

  • Global

The quality and availability of open access/open source software has grown significantly over the past few years. For example, private entities such as Deltares now have an open source policy regarding some flood models. In addition, leaders in developing risk models in the public sector, such as Geoscience Australia (EQRM, TCRM, TsuDAT, ANUGA) and CAPRA (ERN-Flood, Hurricane, CRISIS2007), are launching and/or helping many other initiatives. As we achieve greater interoperability between modelling tools, we will also achieve a future in which open source and open access modelling tools are connected and adapted to unified multi-risk model platforms and highly customized solutions.

It is important to note the difference between open source and open access and to articulate some of the key reasons why open source provides a more transparent framework than open access software packages. Open source, as the name suggests, refers to a software package model whose source code (programming language) is available for access and viewing. There are various formats for open source, with some software code being directly editable, some viewable but not directly editable, and some requiring registration before viewing. Open access, on the other hand, means that the software package is directly downloadable, but that the source code is not editable or viewable. There are also different forms of open access, including full open access, partial open access (i.e., certain components are open), and partial source code.

“Open” also refers to the fact that payment is not required for using a software package, though for the technical and research community, open source provides a transparent, user-community driven solution beyond the free price. In addition to making access to the software code available free of charge, open source software packages have the following advantages:

  • The models and calculations are transparent (not a black box), so the science and assumptions behind the models can be checked and sensitivity analyses undertaken.
  • The software allows users to detect and correct errors and to make direct improvements.
  • Collaborative development of some packages means that many experts work on improving, and solving problems within, the same models.
  • All their processes can be easily replicated and checked, which is critical for validation of the outputs.

Photo credit: Teaser image, Abby Baca, World Bank; Banner image, Miki Fernandez

Featured

Review of Open Source and Open Access Software Packages Available to Quantify Risk from Natural Hazards This document presents an objective analysis of freely available hazard and risk modelling software in order to facilitate selection of appropriate tools for various DRM activities. InaSAFE Video This promo video explains the new features in InaSAFE 2.0. InaSAFE is free software that allows disaster managers to study realistic natural hazard impact scenarios for better planning, preparedness and response activities. It provides a simple but rigorous way to combine data from scientists, local governments and communities to provide insights into the likely impacts of future disaster events.

Related Content

Events

  • Asia Disaster Resilience Forum
  • 2012 Understanding Risk Forum
  • 2014 Understanding Risk Forum
  • 2016 Understanding Risk Forum
  • Understanding Risk Austria 2016
  • UR British Columbia 2020
+ Show more

News

  • Building Resilience with Geonode
  • Watch the video on the East Africa Resilience Hackathon
  • Innovative Apps for Disaster Risk Reduction Win Global Attention
  • Call for Papers: Scoping Report for an Open Risk Data and Modelling Platform
  • Publication Launch: Planning an Open Cities Project
  • Simulating disaster risk management decisions through interactive games
  • Ideathon: Code for Resilience mixes tech and disaster risk experts to spark innovation
  • WCDRR: GFDRR and World Bank engagement
  • Challenging innovators to find new ways to make disaster risk information accessible to all
  • 2016 Understanding Risk Forum Blogs
  • OpenDRI at UR2016!
  • Internet of Things early warning system helps save people from mudslides
  • High resolution digital surface models using drones for coastal communities in São Tomé and Príncipe
  • Leveraging open source as a public institution – New analysis reveals significant returns on investment in open source technologies
+ Show more

Resources

  • Development of the OpenQuake engine, the Global Earthquake Model’s open-source software for seismic risk assessment (Journal Article)
  • Open Data for Resilience Initiative (OpenDRI) Consultancy (Opportunity)
  • Open Data for Resilience Initiative (OpenDRI) Field Guide (Publication)
  • Review of Open Source and Open Access Software Packages Available to Quantify Risk from Natural Hazards (Publication)
  • Understanding Risk in an Evolving World – Emerging Best Practices in Natural Disaster Risk Assessment (Publication)
  • Understanding Risk in an Evolving World – A Policy Note (Publication)
  • Big Data in Action for Development (Publication)
  • Collaborative Strategies for Sustainable EU Flood Risk Management (Publication)
  • UR2016 Proceedings (Publication)
  • Integrated Risk Modeling Toolkit (Tool)
  • Open Data for Resilience Initiative (OpenDRI) e-learning course (Tool)
  • ThinkHazard! (Tool)
  • CatRiskTools (Tool)
  • Index of Geonodes (Tool)
+ Show more
An initiative of

Connect With Our Community

Join Us on LinkedIn Follow Us on Twitter Subscribe to Our Newsletter

© 2025 Copyright Understanding Risk. Privacy Policy Site Credits