Information

Session Lead: Rowan Douglas, Willis Research Network
Members: 74
Latest Activity: May 28 2010
The Future of Climate Modelling
To see presentations from the Climate Risk Modelling Session at the Understanding Risk Conference, click HERE.
In a modelled world, advances in higher resolution climate science will provide fundamental inputs critical to driving our understanding of current and future risks from extreme events. Today, we are only at the dawn of this era.
Until recently, it was only possible to model and predict broad climate variables, such as mean temperature or precipitation. In recent years, however, the modelling community, primarily operating with academia and public science, have been developing models which simulate the world’s oceans, atmosphere and climate to provide a physically based model of the planet. The are called General Circulation Models (sometimes Global Climate Models) or GCMs. It is these models that form the basis of assessments of current and future climate. Advances in modelling techniques, coupled with the advent of even larger super-computers, has enabled scientists to resolve, or see, complex weather events, such as tropical cyclones, in these model simulations. More sophisticated modelling techniques also allow us to assess the regional impacts we can expect from a dynamic climate. These developments hold profound possibilities for the future, and are particularly crucial as more frequent and severe events hasten our need to understand and evaluate atmospheric related hazards.
As a result, climate modelling is now moving into the frontline of economic and political debate. It is the medium and laboratory to assess the current and future risk of environmental change. But there remains a range of scientific, computing and other challenges that must be overcome.
This session will help to unpack and explain those so that the audience obtains the optimum benefit from these emerging capabilities.
The re/insurance industry, for example, traditionally has relied upon historical data, enriched and enhanced by detailed re-analysis, to form the basis of the event sets that drive its loss models. This has had a revolutionary impact on the industry over the past two decades, forming the basis for its progress in catastrophe modelling.
However, we are reaching the limits of the value we can extract from historical data alone. The historical record is relatively short when examining extreme events and may be an increasingly poor indicator of risk levels in a dynamic and changing climate. We need something more to augment history alone.
A focus for this session will be how user communities can help steer and integrate this work to have maximum impact and value to the public and private sector stakeholders charged with managing natural catastrophe risk for their populations.
While the industrial epicentre of these issues may lie within the insurance and reinsurance industries, their nature renders them part of a wider public, economic and political discourse. Indeed, the concept of sharing of risk among populations at local and global scales via public and private mechanisms is on of intense focus and debate, with far-reaching implications for the science and risk management communities.
This session's speakers represent leading research institutions with a significant focus on the expected locations, frequency and severity of extreme weather events. We can expect today’s speakers to provide their own views on the current state of the science of extreme events, future climate activity, and the uncertainties that remain.
In a modelled world, advances in higher resolution climate science will provide fundamental inputs critical to driving our understanding of current and future risks from extreme events. Today, we are only at the dawn of this era.
Until recently, it was only possible to model and predict broad climate variables, such as mean temperature or precipitation. In recent years, however, the modelling community, primarily operating with academia and public science, have been developing models which simulate the world’s oceans, atmosphere and climate to provide a physically based model of the planet. The are called General Circulation Models (sometimes Global Climate Models) or GCMs. It is these models that form the basis of assessments of current and future climate. Advances in modelling techniques, coupled with the advent of even larger super-computers, has enabled scientists to resolve, or see, complex weather events, such as tropical cyclones, in these model simulations. More sophisticated modelling techniques also allow us to assess the regional impacts we can expect from a dynamic climate. These developments hold profound possibilities for the future, and are particularly crucial as more frequent and severe events hasten our need to understand and evaluate atmospheric related hazards.
As a result, climate modelling is now moving into the frontline of economic and political debate. It is the medium and laboratory to assess the current and future risk of environmental change. But there remains a range of scientific, computing and other challenges that must be overcome.
This session will help to unpack and explain those so that the audience obtains the optimum benefit from these emerging capabilities.
The re/insurance industry, for example, traditionally has relied upon historical data, enriched and enhanced by detailed re-analysis, to form the basis of the event sets that drive its loss models. This has had a revolutionary impact on the industry over the past two decades, forming the basis for its progress in catastrophe modelling.
However, we are reaching the limits of the value we can extract from historical data alone. The historical record is relatively short when examining extreme events and may be an increasingly poor indicator of risk levels in a dynamic and changing climate. We need something more to augment history alone.
A focus for this session will be how user communities can help steer and integrate this work to have maximum impact and value to the public and private sector stakeholders charged with managing natural catastrophe risk for their populations.
While the industrial epicentre of these issues may lie within the insurance and reinsurance industries, their nature renders them part of a wider public, economic and political discourse. Indeed, the concept of sharing of risk among populations at local and global scales via public and private mechanisms is on of intense focus and debate, with far-reaching implications for the science and risk management communities.
This session's speakers represent leading research institutions with a significant focus on the expected locations, frequency and severity of extreme weather events. We can expect today’s speakers to provide their own views on the current state of the science of extreme events, future climate activity, and the uncertainties that remain.

















Comment wall (17 comments)
Thank you for this insight.
Outside the 'first world', and given the intense financial pressures upon sovereign borrowers, how can the expense to develop such information products be justified? Must they "ask for it"? Or rather, can these baseline spatial data products - directly tied to risk management - be systematically factored into standard lender procedures?
I recently retired from FEMA after 29 years, and the $1 billion flood Map Modernization initiative was coming to a close. The follow on initiatve expecting to cost $1+ billion will be an integration of hazard mapping(identification), risk assessment, risk communication, mitigation planning, leading to mitigation projects to reduce the risk at the local level. A principle idea is to gain a quantitative understanding of what is at risk - a base line - and begin using resources available from FEMA and other sources to reduce that risk. [A 2006 study by the National Institue of Building Science, Multi-hazard Mitigation Council, concluded that for every dollar spent on mitigation (adaptation in the climate change context) saves a minimum of four dollars on future losses avoided.] The name of this initiative is Risk MAP (Mapping, Assessment, Planning) and will be implemented on a watershed basis, with a focus on improving the flood hazard understanding in areas protected by levees, and in the coastal environment. FEMA is also studying the potential impacts of climate change, including sea level rise, on the National Flood Insurance Program, which is due out this coming Fall. Both these initiatives are worth watching. I am planning on attending the conference on June 2 and would be happy to discuss further.
I think flood risk modeling, more than anything, really brings together more of the issues discussed in these forums, especially in urban shantytowns. We *know* the intensity and frequency is rising, and don't have to wait for the 'black swan' once-every-50 years to have floods. Indeed, this week's hurricane forecast from NOAA indicates it'll be "interesting" in the next few months...
It is quite obvious many of these are being built in high-risk areas, but what is the cause, and what is the effect? It is precisely because the monetary value of this land is low, because the risk is high, they become occupied, and are generally outside the permitting and regulatory process.
What roles are played at the "community", "township", district, etc, on up to borrowers, that address this phenomena, given the pressures of rural poverty, etc?
Not to mention issues of runoff water quality and environmental basin "common goods" of drinking water, soil erosion, fishery stocks, etc etc
Floodplain valuation and risk modeling really brings it all together...
I am Matthijs Kok, from the Delft University of Technology, working at the Flood Risk group.
My point of view is that we should look at flood risk as with any other risk: assess the probability and the consequences, and assess the impact of measures to reduce the risk. Of course, measures which do conserve and improve the ecosytem, ans also protect the people, are often considered very positive, but the society have to balance these benefits against the costs of the measures.
In the Netherlands we have a lot of experience with answering this issue, and we would like to share this experience!
As per my experiences under the wetlands: Mangroves conservation and restoration program in coastal areas of Orissa, West Bengal, Andra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu during 2000-2004. Really It was major prevention measure of destruction of natural resouces. Coastal ecosystem should be conserved and protected by community and forest department which will reduce the climate chance impacts.
Hi Chris,
My main focus is on longer-term tropical cyclone modeling but my colleagues at NCAR have developed a novel way to initialize high resolution real-time forecasts using a cycling data assimilation approach. This will be tested in real-time this summer with the forecasts of track, intensity and storm structure posted on the NCAR website.
Hi Tom,
I intend to keep a keen eye on the real-time 25km resolution Global Atmospheric Model for tropical cyclone predictions this summer. Jeff Gall gave a nice presentation on this at the American Meteorological Society Tropical meeting last week.
hopefully will get a chance to see this work in 'high def' at the upcoming OGC meeting at NOAA in a few weeks :-)
Chris,
Sorry...Link didn't work...trying again with the link for my last message. Text version of address:
http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/cms-filesystem-action/user_files/gav/publicatio...
or link to paper
Hi James,
Nice to see you online...
Hi Chris,
As my work focuses on long-term climate change and hurricanes,
I'm not really involved in the short-term (36-72 hr) hurricane forecasting work, although some of my colleagues (Morris Bender, Bob Tuleya) have been instrumental in developing the GFDL hurricane prediction system that has been used extensively for that purpose. BTW, another interesting piece of work on the horizon is a new statistical/dynamical hurricane forecasting system for Atlantic hurricane activity a season ahead, with potential predictability of up to about a year. Here is the link to the submitted paper by Vecchi et al.:
great to see these high resolution modeling folks!
With hurricane season coming, we certainly want to 'engage' the best/brightest in the 72-36 hour pre-landfall stages to predict storm tracks.
The fact that Manilla, a city with millions of people, was suddenly "caught off-guard" and flooded last Fall, and that Namibia has experience 2 "100 year" floods in the past 3 years is testament to how critical your work is.
Pages